Framing Communication on Reduced Meat Consumption

Buono per la bocca ma non per gli occhi – marzo 2023
Alphaville – RSI Link

Rational and moral motives to reduce red and processed meat consumption
Carfora, V., Conner, M., Caso, D., & Catellani, P. (2020). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50, 744-755.  

Different frames to reduce red meat intake: The moderating role of self-efficacy.
Bertolotti, M., Carfora, V. & Catellani, P. (2020). Health Communication, 35, 475-482. 

Regulatory focus and the effect of nutritional messages on health and well-being: The case of red meat intake.
Bertolotti, M., Carfora, V. & Catellani, P. (2020). Applied Psychology: Health and Wellbeing, 12, 212-230. 

Informational and emotional daily messages to reduce red and processed meat consumption.
Carfora, V., Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2019). Appetite, 141,  

How to reduce red and processed meat consumption by daily text messages targeting environment or health benefits.
Carfora, V., Catellani, P., Caso, D., & Conner, M. (2019). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 

Promoting change in meat consumption among the elderly
Bertolotti, M., Chirchiglia, G. & Catellani, P. (2016). Appetite, 106, 37-47. 

Salute o benessere? Effetti di framing nella comunicazione alimentare rivolta agli anziani
Bertolotti, M. e Catellani, P. (2016). Ricerche di Psicologia, 39, 79-92. 

Adding dynamic norm to environmental information in persuasive messages: The role of receivers’ intrinsic motivation
Carfora, V., Zeiske, N., van der Werff, E., Steg, L. & Catellani, P. (2022). Environmental Communication, 16, 900-919.

Predicting and promoting the consumption of plant-based meat
Carfora V., Morandi M., & Catellani P. (2022). British Food Journal. 124, 4800-4822. 

Legumes or meat? The effectiveness of recommendation messages towards a plant-based diet depends on people’s identification with flexitarians
Carfora, V., & Catellani, P. (2023). Nutrients, 15(1), 15. Online